An American Guide to the “New” Tennis
by Lynn Berenbaum | August 29th, 2006, 6:45 pm

As we roll into the first week of the U.S. Open, the media continues to overflow with stories about how American tennis is flailing. With the retirement of Andre Agassi, (adopted American) Martina Navratilova, the dubious state of the Williams sisters and Lindsay Davenport, and the general speculation about the state of American tennis, it’s time to take a different look at the game and its future. This year’s Open offers a unique challenge and opportunity for European players like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal and Amelie Mauresmo; each of whom are at the pinnacle of the game but who are virtually unrecognizable outside followers of the sport, particularly in the U.S..

Roger Federer is perhaps the biggest anomaly. As one of the greatest to ever play the game, he’s on the verge of winning his third straight U.S. Open, following a fourth consecutive Wimbledon title. An intriguing question is raised as to whether or not Americans will embrace one of the world’s best athletes or simply abandon the sport altogether.

The Tennis Problem

In the 1970s and early ’80s, tennis was booming. Foreign players such as Bjorn Borg, Boris Becker, Stefan Edberg, and Ivan Lendl were household names. Bjorn Borg, in particular, was arguably one of the biggest names of the decade. His legendary battles with John McEnroe energized the tennis world, making Borg one of the few foreign athletes to reach superstar status in the U.S.. Borg was as recognizable to American teens as Swedish supergroup Abba, and almost as well-liked — particularly versus his rival, the super-brat.

American, or not.

In sheer comparison of the Federer-era to the Borg-era, tennis has surely slid in popularity in a big way. Borg was so huge, and his Fila outift was such a well-recognized fashion statement, that it basically defined the look of the 1970s. Amazingly, he never won the U.S. Open.

Today, tennis competes against dozens of entertainment choices and shorter attention spans. In the U.S., cutting through the din of WWE, NASCAR, the NBA, the NFL, and MLB — no less their computerized athlete forms depicted in Playstations and XBoxes coast to coast — is difficult at best. Add to this that tennis is more global than it was during the Borg-era, with tournaments being held on every continent, with a schedule that runs the entire year.

As for American fandom, it doesn’t help that there are only 15 tournaments played in the U.S. Compare this to 1981, when there were 26. Including the U.S. Open, only five tournaments in North America are Masters Series-level or above, which puts players like Roger in the country for less than two months a year. Comparing Federer to, say, Tiger Woods, who spends much of the year traispsing around on U.S. golf courses, and it’s easy to see that no exposure equals, well, no exposure.

Make no mistake, the ATP faces much different problems than those of the WTA. Players such as Anna Kournikova and Maria Sharapova have risen to popularity based on three unique criteria: Sex appeal, a largely American upbringing, and the Internet. Despite the fact that Kournikova hasn’t played a WTA match in three years, she is still one of the most searched items on the Web. In fact, according to MarketLeap, which measures Internet impact, Anna Kournikova is searched over 4,000 times more than Roger Federer. Ask any non-tennis fan if they can name a female player who is not American and is not Kournikova or Sharapova and see what reply you get.

The American Problem

Let’s focus for a moment on the reverse problem for foreign players: Why should they expend the energy on the U.S. market? Federer, for his part, already earns more than $20 million annually, about half from his winnings and appearance fees, and the remainder from numerous sponsorships. Fewer sponsor commitments allows Federer to focus on tennis and maintaining his high ranking.

Despite his travels around New York City last week in preparation for the Open, Rafael Nadal and his team aren’t terribly concerned with improving his image in the U.S either. In Spain, Nadal is a super hero and an icon. He was recently named among the 20 most influential people in the country, and appears regularly in television commercials for sponsors Kia and Nike. He is so famous in Europe, in fact, that he turned down a spot in People Magazine’s “50 Most Beautiful” issue to focus on recovery from a foot injury. Not many 20 year old athletes have such luxuries.

The argument that the sport lacks any true rivalry that would match the Borg-McEnroe era is lame at best. Federer’s rivalry with Rafael Nadal, who can lay claim to four of Federer’s five losses this year, including the French Open — the only Slam that eludes the Swiss player — is palpable to anyone with a passing interest in the men’s game. For their part, the ATP is eating up the rivalry without having to force feed it to fans or followers of the sport. Just last week, Nike sponsored a match between the two on a mid-town Manhattan street that had office workers hanging out of their windows and PR girls in flipflops furiously tap-tapping on their crackberries.

And there are other indications that the modern tennis rivalry is not totally lost in this country. Time magazine slated a four-page story on the duo, and NBC’s ratings for the Wimbledon final between the two this year topped the Federer-Roddick final last year by 19 percent. The Open’s ratings for the final — when and if one of these two make an appearance — are guaranteed to be even higher given the draw the Open holds in the States. Fuggetaboudit.

Footnote: It doesn’t help that the USTA gave up a potential market of $6-10 million per year in funds for its community side by renaming the National Tennis Center for Billie Jean King rather than selling its naming rights to a corporation. One has to wonder what Billie Jean, who is so very committed to community programming, really thinks of that. I suspect we’ll never know.

The American Opportunity

In one respect, the time is ripe for Roger Federer to pounce into full view in the United States. Among the American men, Agassi is days from retiring, Roddick’s play has been unpredictable since 2003, and a big Blake win during the tournament will be a big surprise (a good surprise, but a doubtful one). With that scenario in mind, companies are on the prowl for a spokesman in tennis, and the pickin’s to choose from in the U.S. are slim. The No. 1 player in the game is an obvious alternative.

Even if he is a European.

And Federer is an amazing candidate. He possesses qualities not found in many modern athletes: He’s smart and well-spoken, he even speaks four languages; he is by all accounts a gentlemen, and a stylish and attractive one at that; he’s an ambassador for both the sport and for UNICEF; and, of course, he’s on track to be the greatest player of all-time. He also is focused on his charity, and like Andre Agassi, he will one day be known as much for his foundation’s work as he is for his amazing talents on the tennis court.

How to Win Big in America

Getting into the minds of American fans is a challenge for any foreign athlete. Despite World Cup this summer, you might be hard-pressed to find an American who could pick superstar and globally recognized soccer star David Beckham out of a line-up.

But combined with the TV success of the World Cup this summer, there are signs that the U.S. is looking less isolationist than in the past. Many team sports are assimilating foreign players such as the Dallas Mavericks’ Dirk Nowitzki, the NY Yankees Hideki Matsui, and China’s Yao Ming of the Houston Rockets, with great success.

The New York Times sports magazine, Play, put Federer on the cover of last week’s issue, and the piece written by author David Foster Wallace was the most-emailed article for many days to follow. If Roger Federer makes the breakthrough into the cause célèbre of American consciousness, he will be not just one of the rare tennis players to do so, but one of the only foreign athletes of any stripe from a non-team sport.

Like any top player, creating a balance between work, charity and sponsor commitments is difficult. In a sport like tennis, super-athletes have to also weigh geography. Federer views himself a citizen of the world, and while respecting the large American market, he has no real reason to be in awe of it. He has real reason to be in awe of Asia and the Middle East.

It’s not a stretch to visualize Roger in commercials for Jaguar or selling cameras like Agassi or Sharapova. For her part, Sharapova won the 2004 Wimbledon, gobbled up millions in endorsements and has not won a Slam since. Ditto for her boyfriend Andy Roddick. Federer’s recent signing with IMG super-agent Tony Godsick is evidence that a few global endorsements are on their way.

The question is not whether or not America will warm to Federer, but how soon.

You Might Like:
ATP Fall Guide: Where The Big Boyz – Nadal, Djokovic, Federer – Will Be Playing
Nalbandian Without a Coach, Gilbert Without $20
In A New Book, Novak Djokovic Will Remake Your Body And Life In 14 Days
Andy Murray Has Hired Amelie Mauresmo As His New Coach For The Grass Season
Austin Powers

Don't miss any tennis action, stay connected with Tennis-X

Get the FREE TX daily newsletter

9 Comments for An American Guide to the “New” Tennis

Allie Says:

One can only hope the US will take notice of Federer. It’s fine to be dazzled by style, but substance is far more meaningful, and worthy of the utmost respect and admiration. That said, in my opinion Federer’s game is both the most stylish to watch along with his substantive results. I suppose the only thing that might help his cause would be to smile a bit more during a match…

bina Says:

are andy and maria dating…? no proof? tennis is soo unpopular in america this rurmour was invented for that purpose to get tabloids talking.

if tennis wants to get back to where it was in the 70’s and 80’s it shouldn’t just focus on the american market. quite ovbiously the best players are european and also america doesnt like world sports!!!!

only football (not american) can be called a global sport all the other sports in america…ie nlf, nba etc etc…arent popluar worldwide.

tennis has an advantage that wolrdwide it has that advantage over the nfl and nba. in my opinion is not used by the atp. they only care about promoting it in america.

The Big Lead » blog » The Roundup: Yeah, We’re Hung Over. So? Says:

[…] A damn good guide to the new American tennis. (Tennis X) […]

jlm Says:

brilliant reporting here! roddick is tapping sharapova?? i did not know that!!

Heidi Says:

I wish I could agree with you wholeheartedly. I’d love to see Federer get the high profile he deserves. But I think that he’s difficult to market, and it certainly hasn’t been done well or aggressively enough so far. Now he’s in the odd position of being familiar, around for a while, winning for a while, not the fresh new face, yet trying to break through into popular consciousness? I don’t know. I think he was unfortunate in becoming number 1 while America was still hung up on Andy Roddick. Now that Andy and James are playing well, the corporate world that is interested in tennis endorsements will look to them (and Maria, of course). We shall see.

VGM Says:

Americans barely tolerated Pete Sampras, and he *is* American. A foreign Pete Sampras? Forget it. No wonder soccer’s ratings are way up–it’s from all the people who bailed on tennis.

Gopi Says:

Yes, I also would love to see Federer get the high profile he fully deserves. As you pointed out, it is mind boggling why it is not happening. Why can’t we market a product for what it is? Why does it have to be American first?

Take the US open for example. When does the USTA start Federer? Not on Monday or Tuesday, but on Wed. Many of his matches are scheduled in the day time. And what do they show on TV while Federer is playing? Some other match. It is utterly shocking to see how both the USTA and the USA network are sqandering a golden opportunity to give Federer the profile he deserves and, in turn, help their own bottomlines. Their failure is a big blow to Tennis in the USA.

Anyone will agree that graceful Roger’s tennis is much more entertaining than Pistol Pete’s. But Pete always got the prime time at US open, and full coverage on TV whenever he was playing. Why is that? Is it simply that Pete is American and Roger is not? If so, is the premise that Americans don’t care about non-Americans regardless of how good they are?

I doubt so. I believe Americans appreciate a good thing when they see it. But if USTA doesn’t put Roger on evening matches, if USA network doesn’t show Roger’s matches on TV then how are Americans to enjoy Tennis at its best?

Roger can take tennis to the levels that Tiger did for Golf. Before too long, I hope someone out there will market Federer to the US masses. That would be game, set, and match for Tennis.

Joe Says:

The swoosh on Tiger, the swoosh on Roger, and the alligator on Andy was what the meeting of Tiger and Roger at the US Open was about. It’s the money, not loyalty to a fellow countryman. It’s about an image burned in our minds that hooks two phenomenal winners with a line of mediocre Nike products.

Joe Says:

I hope that Roger’s contract with IMG does not change his non-commercial style. I hope he can return true to himself in the face of the offers IMG will be serving him shortly.

Top story: Isner Seeks Sixth Atlanta Title, Sock Is Back, Dimitrov Unseeded