Roger Federer Presser: What Novak Does So Well Is Even In Defense He’s Offensive
by Tom Gainey | November 13th, 2012, 2:28 pm

For just the second time in his career Roger Federer failed to come through in the championship match at the ATP Finals. Seeking a seventh crown, Federer couldn’t continue a hot start and lost to rival Novak Djokovic 76(6), 75 yesterday in the match played at the London O2.

Federer had won his last two matches with Djokovic and had dominated the event this decade winning in undefeated fashion in 2010 and 2011. But Djokovic was up to the task of ending the Swiss’s reign at the tournament.

Federer ends his season ranked No. 2 after a season in which he won six titles including seventh Wimbledon.

Afterward, Federer reflected on the match, the long season, the speed of the courts these days and what’s to come next for the 31-year-old:

Q. It was hard to get a read on where that match was going a lot of the time. I want to get your thoughts on what the crucial turning points were.
ROGER FEDERER: I think there were too many to really pinpoint one because any one of them obviously could have thrown the match into a different direction again in the first, and in the second, too ‑ more so in the first maybe because there were more twists and turns.
Maybe a bit of regret because I had the lead twice first before him. At the end of the day, that doesn’t matter. You have to get over the finish line in the set and then obviously at the match. He was better at that today.
You know, I thought it was a good match. It was great intensity, good crowd. So it was fun playing.

Q. Could you maybe try and explain to people what it’s like being at the other end of the court from a guy who covers it so phenomenally well as Novak does and the problems that causes you every point.
ROGER FEDERER: I mean, it’s no problem. I mean, I expect tough opponent, a guy who moves well. It’s not like you’re going into the match thinking, Wow, that’s amazing he got that ball back. I mean, we’ve played 30 times, so you know what to expect.
And then there is many other guys moving very well on the tour, as well. It’s not just him. But what he does well, you know, even in defense, he stays somewhat offensive. That’s what I mentioned before the match, that, I think, is what separates him from the rest a little bit.
Maybe for some players it’s easier if a guy defends this way than maybe another guy who just gets the ball back one more extra time and really keeps you doubting. He kinda stays on the offensive, so he really takes time away from you.
Yeah, so today we had times where we had longer rallies, we had times where we had shorter rallies. Like I mentioned, I think we had some great stuff out there. Yeah, it was good playing such points.
Obviously, you need a guy who retrieves well, such as Rafa or Ferrer or Andy or Novak, for that matter. It’s great playing against those guys because the ball does come back a few more times than against other players from time to time and you get those great rallies going.

Q. Andre Agassi said at the final ceremony in Houston in 2003, Roger, I inspire from you. I think that was his motivation, Andre. Now you are 31. I think you have reached Agassi’s position. Who do you inspire from right now?
ROGER FEDERER: I think it’s the love for the game, the appreciation I get from the crowds, I guess playing for records from time to time, playing against different types of generations and playing styles. The game has evolved sort of over the last, what has it been, 13 years I’ve been on tour, 14 maybe. It’s changed quite a bit ever since.
I think you need inspiration, motivation from different angles to keep you going because it ain’t that simple just to wake up every morning and go for another travel around the world, another practice, all these other things, another fitness workout, another stretch.
It’s always nice, but you need to have some success and you need to have the right reasons why you’re doing it. I think I’ve always been able to do that and I really enjoy myself out on the court.
Today was no different. Doesn’t mean it’s not fun when you lose, but it’s definitely not nice, but it also can be entertaining and fun for me if I play a match like today.

Q. You mentioned on the court you couldn’t have played that much better. You played many finals at this event. Would you say, quality‑wise, this was one of the highest quality finals you’ve played in this event?
ROGER FEDERER: Yeah, I mean, it’s hard to say. It’s matchups, again. I have to play so different against Rafa than I have to play against Novak. I have to play different against other players. It’s unfair to say which one has been the best one.
I think the quality was good, you know. I shouldn’t have been broken as often as I was broken today. But then again, that obviously has something to do with Novak, as well, you know.
Overall, I think it was a great match. Yeah, I think I played very well. It was extremely close today.

Q. Can I ask you about the off‑season? The off‑season is longer this year, in response to the feeling that the season was too long, players were getting injured, tired, et cetera. Quite a few players, yourself included, are playing some exhibition matches during the off‑season. Does that in any way go against that the off‑season should be longer to protect player’s health?
ROGER FEDERER: I don’t think it goes against it at all. That’s the beauty of an off‑season, you’re allowed to do whatever the hell you want. I think that’s what’s nice, instead of having such a congested space where you just can barely take enough rest.
Now if players want to play some matches, wherever it may be, that’s their choice. If you want to rest for six weeks, just don’t do anything, you can do that as well, which was not possible in the past. I think it’s definitely good.
Now obviously it’s the responsibility of the players to not make errors and keep on playing, never to rest, all those things. But at least it’s their choice, I find, which is a good thing.
I know I’m playing exhibitions, but I think my situation is pretty unique. I’ve never been to South America as a professional tennis player. Couldn’t be more excited right now for that trip. But I made sure I have a two‑week vacation before that and the preparation for South America.
So for me that is even the beginning of the buildup and the workouts. And on top of it, it’s a lot of fun. Plus I’m not playing any exhibitions after that, like I have in the past. I’m not playing the first week of the year either.
Basically I’ve given myself enough space. It’s about just making sure you manage your schedule correctly. But I don’t think it goes against what you said.

Q. When you were winning your original Masters Cups and these kinds of titles, we were talking about being attacking tennis being to the fore. Now we’re talking about defensive tennis as the norm. Would you like to see or could you see a day when we talk more about attacking tennis than defensive tennis?
ROGER FEDERER: Yeah, I mean, it’s easy fix. Just make quicker courts, then it’s hard to defend. Attacking style is more important. It’s only on this type of slow courts that you can defend the way we are all doing right now.
I think it’s exciting, but no doubt about it, it’s tough. What you don’t want is that you hit 15 great shots and at the end, it ends up in an error.
So I think sometimes quicker courts do help the cause. I think it would help from time to time to move to something a bit faster. That would help to learn, as well, for many different players, different playing styles, to realize that coming to the net is a good thing, it’s not a bad thing.
Then again, the tour has to decide, the tournament directors have a big say in it.
I’m happy with this court. It’s faster. It’s fine, too. I’ve played on all different speeds. But I think some variety would be nice, some really slow stuff and then some really fast stuff, instead of trying to make everything sort of the same. You sort of protect the top guys really by doing that because you have the best possible chance to have them in the semis at this point, I think.
But should that be the goal? I’m not sure.

Q. Do you think you would still be playing if you didn’t have these great rivals playing at such a high level and pushing you?
ROGER FEDERER: Yes, I would. Yeah, I mean, like I said, it’s part of the puzzle that makes me motivated, trying to play against them. But Novak, Andy and Rafa are not the only guys out there. I’m trying to play against many other guys.
I love playing against particularly young guys as well just because too many sometimes I’m an idol, which is very strange to me, to be honest. But it’s nice seeing them grow, see what the next generation comes up with, what kind of playing style.
So for me, that would suffice, as well. Then, of course, unfortunately you have guys retiring now that are my age. That’s been fun, too, still seeing them playing as well, like Tommy Haas, Roddick, Hewitt, Ferrero. It’s been nice seeing them play as well.

Q. Sometimes from the outside we see the match differently from the players. You were attacking all the time, very aggressive. 30 winners against 18. But 42 errors against 28. 24 were forehand errors. Do you think that is because you were trying so much to take initiative, you were taking so many risks and chances that at the end, you were missing more? You made four forehand mistakes when you were up 5‑4, 40‑15. For you, it’s very uncommon. I’ve never seen you miss so many forehands. Were you tired a little bit in the second set or not?
ROGER FEDERER: I don’t read into stats a whole lot anyways. I mean, I think there, you have to talk about me serving 125 up the T three or four times, and him bringing back a bullet. I think this is where he gets me on the back foot. Then for me to miss a forehand after having three great reflex half volleys from the baseline, to eventually miss a shot where you’re a little bit under pressure. It’s called an unforced error. Look, for me, that is not worth the debate.
Obviously I was going to try to go after my shots and not just hand it to him. That’s just how I play tennis. If I have 80 errors and I win the match, I don’t care. I really don’t. For me it’s important to play the right way. I think I did that today.
Sometimes I wish I wouldn’t have missed and I surprised I missed. But then again, it’s all a matter of how does the ball get to you, what has happened in the last five minutes, two minutes, 30 minutes. You just have to absorb all of that, compress it into that one decision you have to make when the ball comes to you. Sometimes you think there is a gap, there is not a gap, then you push and miss it by a little bit.
Yeah, I mean, I think with all those errors, I still played a good match. So I’m happy.

Q. It was the last competitive match of the season. How do you reflect on 2012? What are your goals for the new year?
ROGER FEDERER: I reflect in a nice way. I think it’s been a fantastic season to be part of. Four different Grand Slam champs. Then having the Olympics, as well, was obviously very unique. I’m very happy I stayed injury‑free throughout. That allowed me to basically play a full schedule almost.
I’m very pleased that I was able to pick up my performance at the end of the season, like I played now this week. So obviously gives me confidence for next year.
I haven’t really set clear goals yet for next year. I first have to make sure I create my schedule so it makes sense for my practice schedule. Like I mentioned, I need to practice a whole lot more next year, because this year, I hardly did have an opportunity to do. I have some catching up to do in that standpoint.
Then I’ll see what’s most important to me and the team, then I’ll go from there. That probably will be decided in the next month or so.

Q. What are your expectations to finish your season in Sao Paulo in Brazil?
ROGER FEDERER: Like I said, it’s super exciting for me. It’s just around the corner now. It’s important for me to rest now. When I do come over there, I can enjoy it incredibly because I’m probably going to be meeting many people. There’s going to be a lot of stuff to do. I’m really looking forward to it.
An amazing crowd I’m sure it’s going to be with the three different players I’m playing against over there. It’s really something I’m looking forward to since a long time now. What has it been, nine months now, since the announcement or so. I’ve heard so many great things about South America in general, about Brazil, as well in particular.
Hopefully it’s a once‑in‑a‑lifetime experience for me.

Federer did come up with arguably the shot of the tournament:

You Might Like:
Roger Federer: I Tried To Play Offensive Against Nadal, I Just Didn’t Have The Best Day [Video]
Roger Federer Is Fit And Happy For 2019 [Video]
Novak Djokovic Goes Skydiving… Indoors [Video]
In Preparation For His London Title Defense, Novak Djokovic Took A Cable Car Ride [Video]
Andy Murray Has A Hip Issue Ahead Of His Wimbledon Title Defense

Don't miss any tennis action, stay connected with Tennis-X

Get the FREE TX daily newsletter

32 Comments for Roger Federer Presser: What Novak Does So Well Is Even In Defense He’s Offensive

Brando Says:

EXCELLENT interview!

‘I need to practice a whole lot more next year, because this year, I hardly did have an opportunity to do. I have some catching up to do in that standpoint.’

This guy is so MOTIVATED- respect him alot for that!

For me LESS IS MORE for roger going forward regarding his schedule!

majorfedfan Says:

Thanks! Great to read the whole thing, not just small excerpts here and there.

bstevens Says:

I like Fed’s simple solution to encourage more attacking-style tennis: speed up the courts.

It has been an interesting year as a tennis fan:
– all 4 slams one by different players (first time since 2003)
– Murray finally getting his first slam
– Ferrer winning 7 titles this year at age 30
– Del Potro re-emerging as the biggest threat to the big 4
– Federer winning his 7th Wimbledon at age 31 and temporarily regaining world number 1
– Nadal winning 8 consecutive Monte Carlo titles and 7 total French Opens
– Djokovic backing up his great year last year with again year-ending number 1
– Canadian tennis having a player in the top 15 (go Canada)

Lets hope for more good storylines in 2013!

bstevens Says:

^ and honourable mention to Jerzy Janowisz for coming out of nowhere to almost winning a Masters title

Alok Says:

So sad for Fed. He’s right on the attacking style of tennis, but that will have to wait for the next crop of players.

I hope we can see more players like Janowicz who want to break through and not get intimidated by the ranking next to a player’s name.

grendel Says:

Federer has always been touchy about this unforced errors business…..

Alok Says:

I think that’s old school thinking because a lot of the past older players see UEs as a weakness.

racquet Says:

@ bstevens

Those are all very good factors contributing to an exceptionally interesting year. I would only add the Olympics.

andrea Says:

i only saw a brief snippet of the match…when fed had the chance to go up two breaks in the second. was surprised to find out he lost the second set 7-5. sounds like both gave it there all. not sure about coming out strong against novak and then ending so poorly. he’s going to have to work on that.

but credit to novak for hanging in there – that seems to be his forte…just when you think he’s done, he’s back.

Chichiback Says:

Love Federer. Go Fed go !!

grendel Says:

andrea – “not sure about coming out strong against novak and then ending so poorly. he’s going to have to work on that.”

You know, I’ve seen Federer do this before lots of times, most notoriously against Nadal on clay – I think it was Monte Carlo. Nadal simply waited for the storm to subside (a glorious storm while it lasted, b.t.w.), and in effect, that’s what Djokovic did last night. Not sure how you CAN work on something like that. After all, it’s not altogether up to you, is it? There’s this annoying chap on the other side of the net who doesn’t know his place and will stick his oar in. These scurvy fellows, don’t they understand what spoilsports they are…..

Nice to hear from you again andrea. I never actually think Djokovic is done, bugger always comes back….

skeezer Says:

“not just small excerpts here and there.”

So true.

volley (#antifed) cherry picked this interview back on another thread, and true to his/her (her) form, got it wrong(like “ERA”)Kudos to Tom Gainey posting the entire interview so the full context and full meaning was explained.


dari Says:

Hey, this was a nice interview. a bit of sass in there, as i like, too.
like the way he summed up the essence of tennis “… You just have to absorb all of that, compress it into that one decision you have to make when the ball comes to you.”


Robs Says:

Grendel! I love your comments! I’m a huge Nole fan, but I love your ” the bugger always comes back…” that’s him! Americans love your British adjectives. I can’t wait till 2013! Love this ATP, a bit depressing that there will be no tennis till January! Ugghh! See you DownUnder!

Wog boy Says:


You beat me for that one, “bugger” one :)

grendel style as usual, joy to read:)

Michael Says:

Yeah, there must be a reason why Novak has been able to beat the Top players quite consistently. Roger is right about evaluating Novak who combines defence with offense superbly. I do not think any other player does that with finesse as Novak does. But the greatest asset of Novak according to me is his return of serve, especially the second serves. He wins the point based on that one shot – return.

Michael Says:

I do not think Roger played the best match against Novak. He made lot of unforced errors in crucial moments which cost him the match. But he did play better than he did in the early phase of the tournament.

jane Says:

” That’s the beauty of an off‑season, you’re allowed to do whatever the hell you want. ”

Indeed! Ha – very succinct.

I like that Fed said Nole’s defence is also offensive. Offensive how, you might ask? ;) hee hee, just kiddin.

TJ Says:

I agree Michael. Roger didn’t play his best match yet he is the guy who is chasing djokovic and not anyone from this so called stong-era!

Like Fed, I am glad he’s having fun. It’s all gravy from here. The more novak win, the more he will secure Fed’s legacy! [ also cement his own as the 2nd best guy on this side of 2000s]

Margot Says:

@ grendel
Nole is like Rafa now, got that “never say die” attitude, which makes him so formidable.
Ahem…do u guys actually know what a “bugger” is?

TJ Says:

trust old geezers to overhype facts.

Nole always comes back? exaggeration much?

Most of his come-backs are against Roger [6years older, surely that is a factor] and murray [ a mental whacko].

Against Nadal, Nole came back at AO, but did not do so at french open. If there’s a black mark on nole’s resume, it is that french open final and the other clay losses he suffered to nadal. After straight setting him in rome/madrid last year, nole has taken a step-back.

I hope he rights that and establishes himself as the superior player on clay, GOING FORWARD!

Margot Says:

PS, grendel know u know and were using the term affectionately/admiringly, just wondering about the others…;)

Wog boy Says:

I know it is basically bad word (I checked it up:)) but here it is commonly used in innosent manner, if something bad happen to you than you use it as …”ohhhhh bugger”…. or if something bad happen to somebody you say “poor bugger”, it is often used in Australia and not in bad meaning, though you can hear when somebody “bugger off” somebody….that is bad.

grendel Says:

@ TJ, 2.45. Spare me from literalists!

Margot, whilst the term “bugger” does still carry its original connotation, it has evolved almost into a term of affection, especially, as Wog boy says, in Australia (“silly old bugger dropped his false teeth down the well”).

Nims Says:

It’s such a pleasure when two guys play their best in a single match. I have never seen Roger play better tennis than what he did in the finals. This match showcases the skills of Novak and how he has taken tennis to next level.

The biggest challenge for the coaches for the next season would be to find a spot in the service court which can hurt Novak’s return. On the ground, not sure if there is a place in the court when anyone can hurt Novak anymore.

Andy tries the tactic of making Novak run down on the baseline by simply directing the balls to either side of the court. He is successful with the approach, but that can be done only when Novak is a passive mindset.

The big question mark is, where do you hurt this guy?

If people don’t figure it out in next 2 years, then it would be wise to call Novak the best tennis player ever. Let’s see.

jamie Says:

2013 will be a bad year for Federer and Nadal fans. They are ovah.

tennis-is-fun Says:

Glad to hear Roger is planning more pratice. He recognizes, as much as us watching, that his shot is not at his best, after Wimbledon this year… This is due to the 2012 schedule.

I believe he has overachieved to be able to beat Murray in the semi final, and contested so closely in the final. Winning the trophy is nice; I think losing could give a touch more momentum into 2013.

Look at how the winners of the final do in the next year… Do they back it up? Sometimes, but more often not winning big stuff.

sheila Says:

i’m not a nadal fan, but i think he will come back with a vengence in 2013. he likes being alpha male so he could win a couple of majors or even more. i am a diehard federer fan but he will be 32 yrs old & i find, not only are djokovic, nadal & murray beating him consistently, so are berdych, delpotro, & tsonga beating him more frequently. if he cant get by the 2nd tier guys then getting to a final might be quite difficult for him. i hope i’m wrong, but roger is a bit older than these guys & the game is so physical. lots of people writing nadal off. i wouldnt. he will be more motivated than ever & he will be the player to take #1 ranking from djokovic. after watching murray, djokovic & federer play in year end finals, murray, imho has the biggest groundstrokes. some of his forehands against federer were massive, i just think he is mentally inconsistent & i think a test for him will be how he handles nadal in majors in 2013. berdych, tsonga & delpotro cant get by djokovic, murray or nadal so i dont see them winning a major.

rogerafa Says:

@ Nims

You are getting carried away. Do not exaggerate so much. Neither Novak nor Roger played their best tennis. You have not seen Roger much if you think you have never seen Roger play better tennis than what he did in the finals. You make it sound as if Novak is or is going to be invincible. I do not know about the future but he did lose twelve times this year. It is possible that he may go on a tear in the next two or three years and lose very few matches or none at all. As of now, other players still have some hope.

Nims Says:


I do understand that. That’s why I said we need to wait for few more years. But Novak had shown that on HC, he is the toughest guy to beat. Note, he is playing against an all time great and HC specialists in the finals and still coming on top consistently.

TJ Says:

Novak is already the 2nd greatest of this era outside the stupid clay surface. It would be wonderful achievement if he were to win 10 GS on hardcourts and 17 GS on hard courts + grass and 7 year end championships to overtake Federer.

You cannot pick a more perfect player to achieve that. maybe safin, but well, let’s not go down that path with Safin – what he should have achieved!

Rogerfan Says:

Wow i like this website…tennistalk site is filled with as***le federer haters all they do is bashing federer each and every time…this site is great

Top story: Djokovic Saves MPs In Thrilling 5-Set Win Over Federer In Wimbledon Final