U.S. College Tennis is Dead After Scoring Changes, Foreign Invasion

by Jeremy Davis | August 12th, 2014, 10:19 am
  • 6 Comments

U.S. college tennis has been going downhill for a long time. Over the years the lack of leadership has seen the institution stand by twiddling its thumbs and saying “Things are Great!” while international players take over the sport at U.S. colleges, resulting in universities cutting men’s and women’s tennis programs.
ADHEREL
If you have to cut a sport, why not the one with no cap on foreign players, comprised of almost all foreign players?

Now this week the Intercollegiate Tennis Association announced what might be the final nail in the coffin — changing all scoring at the Division I level to no-ad scoring in singles and doubles, shortening doubles to one set, stopping all matches when the overall match has been determined, and other changes to shorten the game.

Why? So college tennis can be more TV friendly.

News flash: no one gives two craps about watching college tennis on TV, and never will.

The result: the integrity of college tennis as a training ground for the pros is ruined. What top juniors want to go to college now and play no-ad scoring and shortened matches?

Virginia coach Brian Boland, speaking to zootennis.com, is on the ITA’s men’s operating committee and was the only one to vote against the new rules.

He said, “It hurts our game, I am fine with the no-ad in doubles, but this hurts us. The college coaches want to skip the hard work to get people engaged. This is not the answer at all. I am beyond disappointed.  We need great leadership in the greatest game on earth. If we locate great leadership, anything is possible, but changing the traditions of our great game is not the answer.”

Translation: The people in leadership positions in college tennis have been screwing up for a while, but this is a game-changing screw-up.

“To stop matches at 4 (the clinch-clinch change) is absolutely counterproductive to developing a player,” he says. “The more matches these young men play the more productive for their development; they need to finish their matches even if the team match is over. I am concerned a couple of my guys will only play 2 or 3 matches to completion next spring. How is that positive for their development? I went to the College World Series (in Omaha) to support my good friend and neighbor and several of the games lasted over four hours, but I doubt they’re looking to go to six innings. They respect their game and have tremendous leadership. The atmosphere was amazing. The solution is to find a final site that can accommodate the number of teams (at the NCAAs). We have a circus-like atmosphere now and this like swallowing a pill to fix our problems.”

The majority of starting players on NCAA Division I teams are international players, and now scoring will be no-ad with short sets. College tennis has jumped the shark.

Scratch one more way for the struggling U.S. tennis system to develop more top pros.

 


You Might Like:
John Isner: “Without College I Wouldn’t Be Here Today, I Can Say That With 100% Certainty”
John Isner goes from College to Pro Prime Time at 2010 US Open
Talking Tennis with IMG/Bollettieri’s Scott Treibly
Kvitova Comes From a Set Down at WTA Prague, 3rd Title of 2018
Petra Kvitova Severely Injures Left Hand During Home Invasion Attack

Don't miss any tennis action, stay connected with Tennis-X

Get the FREE TX daily newsletter

6 Comments for U.S. College Tennis is Dead After Scoring Changes, Foreign Invasion

SG1 Says:

US men’s tennis is dead in general. It’s time for a radical shift in strategy. First off, tennis has to be made more accessible. To a very large degree, tennis is still a club sport. Want more great tennis players. Build more public courts and inexpensive access to indoor ones. The other change I’d make…get the kids starting to play out on red dirt. Teach them how to construct and win a point first. There’s plenty of time down the road for the Bolletieri Big Serve + Big Forehand strategy.

Federer, Murray, Nadal, Novak, Stan and other Europeans understand how to build a point and they have the big shots.


SG1 Says:

As for no-ad tennis…puh-leeze. How is this going to get things turned around? It’s unfortunate the the financial tail wags the dog for pretty much everything these days.


Humble Rafa Says:

First they invaded the Presidency, now the colleges. This is totally unacceptable.

Only foreigners will pay for free, I guess. In Humble travels, tennis courts are not used in ‘Merica. They are for bbq’s and such.


Frankie Says:

And this is the route McEnroe thinks future slam winners should take? Big mistake!


MMT Says:

These are the stupidest changes I’ve ever heard. Not that I watched a lot of college tennis in the first place, but this just guarantees that I won’t follow it at all.

To be honest, I only ever watch weird tennis formats if there’s a chance I’ll see something out of the ordinary, like Agassi or Hingis playing singles against a high profile player. Otherwise, these hokey formats are for the birds.

If they want tennis to be more TV friendly they can enforce the rules on time-wasting and injury time-outs – those are the worst. Better yet, put a shot clock (with one time-out per game to the server) and ONE injury time-out per tournament for all players.


skeezer Says:

Preach it MMT.

Top story: Sinner Leads Italy Past Australia For Their Second Davis Cup Title