Rafael Nadal: I Didn’t Play With The Right Intensity, The Right Rhythm, Tomas Was Better Than Me Today

by Staff | January 27th, 2015, 2:15 am
  • 37 Comments

Rafael Nadal’s hammerlock on Tomas Berdych was broken today as the Czech hung on for a 6-2, 6-0, 7-6(5) win in the quarterfinals of the Australian Open.

Berdych, who had lost an incredible 17 straight matches to Nadal (now 18-4 vs Rafa), played the first two sets in near perfect form. Hugging the baseline, blasting winners and munching on Nadal’s weak second serve, which Nadal didn’t win a single point on in until the third.

With his back against the wall, Rafa stepped up in the third set, nullifying an early break chance to force a breaker. But Berdych wouldn’t be denied.


The win puts the 29-year-old into his second straight Australian Open semifinal, 5th of his career. He also avoids becomes the first man in the Open Era to lose to another player 18 times.

Since his 14th Grand Slam title in Paris last June, Nadal hasn’t made a semifinal nor has he beaten a Top 10 player. Nadal’s bid for a second “Career Slam” is also over.

After the match, Nadal met the press:
Q. Were you feeling at all unwell or unfit today?
RAFAEL NADAL: No. I am feeling okay. Just was not my day. I didn’t play with the right intensity, with the right rhythm, and the opponent played better than me. In sport, when you are going to play against an opponent, was a day that the opponent played better than me.

Q. Do you think it’s also the fact that you haven’t played such a player for a while, the whole process of coming back?
RAFAEL NADAL: Well, is probably not the day to talk about that. We talked enough about that before the tournament and almost every day, so is a day that I just can congratulate my opponent, accept that. Is obvious that I needed something more to be more competitive, as I did in the third. The third was the right set, the right game that I have to play. But is obvious that before I didn’t play with the right confidence, with the right intensity, losing court, playing very short. I make him play very easy. So you cannot expect to win matches in quarterfinals of Grand Slam helping the opponent to play well. That’s what I did. The first two sets, the beginning — since the beginning of the third, I played with more character, more the way that I have to play to have chances to keep being — to be where I want to be, to be where I have been for the last lot of years. I don’t know how many. So that’s it. Just will keep working hard on the things that I have to do. As I said when I arrived here, the process always is not easy. When you have injuries, are difficult the comebacks. There are so many examples around the world of sport that have been tough to be back. For me, I’m not an exception on that, no? I have to take the positive things. Without being at my top level of tennis I was able to be here in quarterfinals. Is not a bad result at all for me arriving here the way I arrived: only with one match, only with five matches in seven months. So taking the positive part, that’s the thing that I have to take. That’s just the beginning of the season, and I want to keep having chances to compete well against everybody. I need to keep working the way that I am doing for be ready for the next. The season is long, I know. Beginnings are tough. I need to be ready to accept all the situations that’s going to happen or happened and try to be strong, accepting everything, and working hard to be back the way that I want to be. When I say ‘be back,’ I don’t mean win or lose, I mean have the feeling on court that when you are there you feel confident, you feel you can compete against everybody with equal conditions.

Q. We will never know, but do you think if you had won that third set it could have changed everything, or were you still feeling that Tomas had a little bit the upper hand?
RAFAEL NADAL: “If” doesn’t exist in sport. That’s the real thing. If, if, if – never comes. The thing is, you have to do it. I didn’t have the chance to play the fourth; I lost the third, so that’s it. That’s sport. I lost the third. He’s happier than me in the locker room. I am not very happy because I didn’t competed the way I wanted to competed the first two sets and that’s something that I don’t like. But I tried my best again in the third. I was closer. I had some chances with the 4-All, some breakpoints. The tiebreak I was there fighting even that the situation was tough. But he played aggressive. The tiebreak, he served well. Two sets to love advantage makes the opponent play with more calm than if he is one set to love or one set all. That’s a big difference.

Q. Speak a little bit about Berdych today. Do you think he has what it takes to go all the way in this tournament?
RAFAEL NADAL: I don’t know if he can go all the way to win this. There’s so many good players there that are playing very well. Andy is playing so well. We’ll see. It’s true that Tomas is playing well. Just happy to see the way that the tournament develops. The best players are there fighting for the tournament. Tomas is a very regular player that he deserves to be there. He have been in the top positions of the rankings for a long, long time, being very regular, being very professional on what he’s doing. So he deserve that. And now let’s see what’s going on, no? For me, I feel that he resisted well in the third. But before was too easy for me to analyze the way he played. He played well, obvious. But my feeling was that I help him a lot in the beginning, no? Is easier to play well when you are up in the score, one break up, two breaks up from beginning of every set, no? That’s a big deal, big difference.

Q. The TV showed you taking a pill at some stage early in the third.
RAFAEL NADAL: Yeah, happened nothing. I am feeling well. That’s it. That’s part of the things that happen sometimes during the matches, but nothing important to say.

Q. Was there anything particularly about Tomas’ game today that you found difficult to deal with?
RAFAEL NADAL: No, it’s always that he serve very well. He played aggressive. But I say before, no, in the third, yes, I was able to maintain the rhythm of the ball, to try to put one more ball inside. If I’m able to do that for two hours and a half, three hours, then he can feel the pressure, he can feel more tired when he’s going for the shots. But the real thing, I tested him for one hour, for a set. For the rest of the thing I didn’t test him in general. As I said before, Tomas is ranked No. 5, No. 6 of the word, No. 7, I don’t know. He’s a top player. We cannot expect the things that — all the challenges that he put me on court today because he’s a top player. You have to play well to win against a player like Tomas. I didn’t play my best today. He played better than me and that’s it. That’s the sport. Sometimes, almost every time, is simple: the player who plays better, the player who is able to maintain the better rhythm, the better concentration, play with less mistakes, is the player who has more success. And today this player has been Tomas.

Q. Have you ever had a tournament like this where you felt like you’ve been so up and down? If so, how were you able to manage your expectations coming in today? Were you…
RAFAEL NADAL: I’m sorry. Can you repeat the beginning?

Q. You have been very up and down. You’ve had a very good match and you’ve had a so-so match today.
RAFAEL NADAL: No, not so-so, very bad. You can say, no problem (smiling).

Q. How hard is it to go on court not knowing what to expect from yourself each match?
RAFAEL NADAL: Nothing new in my side. Is not the first time in my career I have been injury. Is not the first time that I have bad feelings when I am coming back. Is normal and is part of the process. Is part of the process that when I am playing bad, I cannot play that bad. When I am playing well, I have to be able to maintain that level of tennis. When you are coming back from an injuries you lose more easier the feeling than what you do when you are on rhythm, when you are with no injuries, when you are confident in yourself that you played a lot of matches. And that’s the thing that happened, no? When I was playing well, I played well. But at the same time, against Sela I played two well two sets, played bad the third. Against Anderson, was probably the only match I played regular. Played the right level during almost all the time. The rest of the matches have been lot of up and down. Against players, top players like the one that I played today, you need to be more — you cannot be here and here. When you are playing a five-set matches, you’re not going to be during the five sets here. But when you are playing bad, you cannot come here. You have to be here. You cannot make that big difference of level during the match. That’s the things that can happen when you are coming back from an injury, when you are out of rhythm.


You Might Like:
Rafael Nadal Saves 2 MPs In Rio SFs, Says He Didn’t Play Well, But Kept Fighting, Running For Everything
Lukas Rosol Didn’t Beat Rafael Nadal, But He Did Knock Over One Of His Water Bottles! [Video]
Rafael Nadal Said It Didn’t Matter That He Played On Suzanne Lenglen
Rafael Nadal: I Need To Play With More Rhythm, Intensity And Stability [Video]
Even Uncle Toni Agrees, Rafa Didn’t Deserve To Win Madrid

Don't miss any tennis action, stay connected with Tennis-X

Get the FREE TX daily newsletter

37 Comments for Rafael Nadal: I Didn’t Play With The Right Intensity, The Right Rhythm, Tomas Was Better Than Me Today

sienna Says:

Fedal are just regular top players when they are hampered some what. Bee sting in finger hampers serve and weeks without propper training hampers fysique in general.

So Nadal was not ready.
Of course this means that he needs la decima! otherwise he will not reach #17.


brando Says:

Bravo Rafael on those answers! Calm, collected, honest and forthright in addressing them. Love the attitude despite the loss: the ability to remain calm despite the loss, the recognizing the loss for what it is, and the knocking of the ‘if theory’, ie engaging in self pity. You did brilliantly rafael: did the best you could in yourcircumstances, improved from where you were prior to the event, lost a player who took the opportunity in front of him like a top players should, and walk away with knowledge on how to improve. It’s easy to admire a player when he wins: but your fans most admire you regarding your attitude, mindset towards defeat, heartbreak and difficult moment. It’s what makes you Rafael Na dal and if anything seperates you from the rest it’s that more than anything. Well done on your efforts, fight in Australia and your fans are with you for whatever lies ahead since we know you”ll try your damn hardest and fight no matter what the situation. Vamps rafa!


brando Says:

Vamos rafa not Vamps lols.


Giles Says:

Brando. Thanks for that post. Spot on.


Okiegal Says:

C’mon Andy…….You’re my second fav….take it
to Nick…..Would love to see you win the whole thing!!


brando Says:

@Giles: no worries my cyber friend!:-) All it took was some understanding, perspective regarding the situation and knowledge, admiration of the type of character Rafael Nadal is. I have said it before and I’ll say it again: it’s nothing but pure privilege to root for him since regardless of the result it’s such a joy to root for someone who plays with such passion, fight and with a spirit that never quits regardless of the situation. The loss was bad: but Rafael’s desire to improve is greater. I think I speak for other fans beyond myself when I say this: down for whatever that may lie ahead, since the result always comes second to just seeing the brilliant Nadal take to the court and play the game he loves so dearly. Vamos rafa!


Nirmal Kumar Says:

The great champion can hold his head high. No shame in losing to a player like Berdych and also when you are short of match practice. I strongly believe if his health holds up, he would be back to his form in Clay.

Measured interview and Rafa was looking to lose early considering his form and lack of match practice even before the tournament started. So no surprise there.


gonzalowski Says:

Congratulations to Thomas!
Bagel on the second pfiuuu…Rafa’s attitude has been very good on this loss (I mean press conference); for me, it hasn’t been so painful loss.
Good post, Brando, Regards to Giles and Rafa fans


metan Says:

I hardly comment on Rafa’s Presser. This one is classy. I hope you will have better clay season. All the best.


sienna Says:

But WOW getting bagled in a slam is not good for his confidence.

I easiley can see a upset come clay. Especially if he loses a few clay matches this year leading up to Garros.

Garros on a hot day plays like HC so weather conditions will be important. one of the big hitters can blow him of the court on a good day even with clay being the underground.
And there are plenty of big hitting guys comming into the game.

Of course when Rafa doesnot take GARROS 2015 his dream of becomming slam leader is almost over.


Michael Says:

It is clear from the interview that Rafa is not rattled by this loss and is staying more focused dedicated and committed to put his house in order. From the very beginning of Australian Open, he under played his chances considering the overall circumstances that evolved and stated that he would by very happy if he managed to reach the quarter finals. He has infact achieved this goal and his next objective is to how to improve things from here on. With the clay season fast approaching, Rafa would be mighty pleased for it gives him an opportunity to take his game to the next level.


Margot Says:

RG will be the test.


Giles Says:

RG will be the test for what?


sienna Says:

So that was a very meekly perfotmance by Nadal.
Meekly during match and in the aftermath.

He is playing this role as underdog in extreme.
it fits like a glove.


skeezer Says:

Since his 14th Grand Slam title in Paris last June, Nadal hasn’t made a semifinal nor has he beaten a Top 10 player.
Wow.


El_Flaco Says:

I can’t believe Nadal lost to Berdsh!t.


Humble Rafa Says:

Since his 14th Grand Slam title in Paris last June, Nadal hasn’t made a semifinal nor has he beaten a Top 10 player.
Wow.

Is there a tennis season past the FO? I have not been made aware.


Joe W Says:

unfortunately missed the match. When Thomas serves consistently and holds his service games he’ll take more risks from the baseline and force his opponent into bad shots. He’s knocked Fed out of a couple of slams too doing just that. Rafa First said he felt fine physically but then referenced “recovery” a couple of times during the presser. My guess is he’s still not 100% mentally ready too


Gordon Says:

Nadal really is a class act. Super post-match press interview.

The greats of this game are so good at compartmentalizing that both losing in straights and the second set bagel will be out of his head before his first match at Indian Wells.

No matter what you think of Berdych you have to give him credit for striving to improve. He looks fitter and he executed his game plan well.

However, don’t bet against Rafa the next time these two meet.

Rankings wise, I thought Nadal would be in a better position to close in on Federer after the Swiss lost to Seppi, but Nadal – who was defending runner up points from AO2013 has pretty well ensured that at least through Wimbledon every tournament he plays will hold a 50-50 chance that Djokovic could be his semi-final opponent.

It’ll be an interesting year ahead, that’s for certain.


the_mind_reels Says:

@Gordon: minor correction, but I think what you meant was that Nadal is defending RU points from the 2014 AO. He’ll be dropping ~ 900 points with Federer dropping ~ 600 points after this tournament.

There’s a chance Nishikori passes Nadal in the rankings after this tournament, as Kei is defending only a 4th round showing. He’ll have to get through Wawrinka in order to do that, though.

I like Murray making the finals, and it’s hard to pick against Djokovic, but we know he’s struggled at times against both Nishikori and Wawrinka.


TennisVagabond.com Says:

Shocking result given their history and head to head, but as Brando kept reminding us, Rafa wasn’t as ready as he wants to be. Its still a great start to his comeback, and I think he’ll have a great 2015. Sorry to Rafa fans, but I think most of the fans on this site had low expectations for this tourney.
As for the no-semis-or-top-ten wins since RG, how many tournaments is that over? He played Wimbledon, then nothing till a couple fall tourneys. So I don’t think that’s a meaningful stat at all.

Good, classy interview, especially considering (from what I remember) he doesn’t like Berdych much but he avoided any sour grapes.


Gordon Says:

@ the mind reels. You are right; I meant 2014, not 2013.


Daniel Says:

TennisVagabond.com

I think it was Halle, Wimbledon, Beijing, Shanghai, Basel Doha and now AO, 7 tourneys.

A better indication will be Rio in 3 weeks time, not a heavy field and he is defending champion as well. If he misses that can’t see him being a factor in IW and Miami also. But he needs to build his confidence in next 3 tourneys to enter clay season better to develop there and get ready to Garros. I bet he prefer to not reach a single final the whole season as long as he gets #10. That’s what matters the most for him this season.


Emily Says:

@Daniel, I agree about the French. Rafa’s said that winning Roland Garros is his priority every year, even more than getting back to #1. This was a good result for him after so little match play and he showed his fight and desire in the 2nd round match especially.

Few players will says in a press conference that he was playing badly and that improving as the match goes on doesn’t change the result. He has perspective on what lies ahead and he handled all his interviews with grace. J-Mac stated that having Rafa back is good for tennis and it’s nice to see such positive comments on a thread that could have devolved into a Fedal war.

Looking forward to today’s quarterfinals, go Stan!


Brando Says:

@Emily:

Great post and I completely agree.


Brando Says:

‘could have devolved into a Fedal war.’:

Have to say:

Major, major props to the Federer fans regarding how they have been towards Rafa post this loss.

Rafa got knocked out, obvious bummer but barring one particular madam who we all ignore, every Fed fan has been fantastic and fair towards Rafa post this loss.

Even Skeez after his shots at HR i think.

Major props for not kicking a man after he’s down and being reasonable towards him.

At the same time I have to say:

The amount of colossal, outright BS yapped by another fanbase post this loss has been surprising and quite revealing at the same time.

Shady, —chy stuff of the abject kind, riddled with accusations regarding Rafa that are baseless and stuff of the gutter you expect from the petty.

To be honest:

I consider it the act of weasels to knock a player when he’s down.

It ONLY shows fear regarding that player one possesses especially when the player- as this result just confirmed- was always going to struggle early in his comeback trail.

They worry about his challenge, prop him up when everyone can see he’s undercooked and then knock him when he’s down in cowardly fashion: confirming that old say ‘in the heart of cowards lies great fear’.

Oh well: ph–k those cowards.

Props again to the Fed fans for being splendid:

You could have knocked Rafa, probably most his fans would have expected it too but you have been fair, reasonable with him.

Thanks for that good luck to Fed down the line as Rafa said post Fed’s loss: he can do whatever he wants after his career, but be sure he’ll end the year with one of the best results!


Patson Says:

@skeezer

Not surprising. How many tournaments has he played since ?


mat4 Says:

@Brando:

I just read your post and I don’t really understand it. What does it mean: “Kicking a player when he is down?”

Every player is down, a day or another, and to notice it isn’t “kicking”. It is just: “writing, noticing, saying”. Berdych was the one who kicked him today.

If some remarks were addressed to me — please, give me a clear answer:

did or did not Rafa’s results deteriorated since the introduction of the biological-passeport in tennis?

Yes or no?

It was in September 2013, just to remind you. And from that time, Rafa won 2 minor tournaments at the beginning of the 2014, a just two in the last 11 months. JUST TWO, both time against ailing opponents. He lost against players ranked, among others: 31, 85, 144, 56, 124, 127.

When we compare this with his comeback in 2013, when he was off the courts for 7 months! the difference couldn’t be bigger.

I also wrote that it all could be a coincidence, and that time could prove me wrong.

It is a very legitimate question to ask.

So: yes or no?


mat4 Says:

And questions about doping HAVE TO BE ASKED!

We can’t pretend that there is no doping in tennis — in an epoch when we know that all the finalists of the 1991 100m world final but one were using illegal substances, when we know that the greatest cyclist in the last 30 years was doping, when we had “operation Puerto” and the case of dr. Fuentes — who admitted helping tennis players, when we have the investigation of dr. Luis Garcia del Moral, the Troicki case, the Cilic case, when Pedro Munoz, the former president of the Spanish tennis federation said that the ATP has concealed “many” doping violations, when Agassi gave proofs of that in his biography…

So, maybe we won’t get answers, but we have not only the right, but the obligation to ask questions.


skeezer Says:

mat4,
You come up with some very interesting questions. Especially the Passport thingy implemented in 2013.
But trying to convince a Rafa fan other than that he is nothing but pure righteous Gold is blasphmey.


mat4 Says:

@Skeez:

I am not trying to convince anybody. I know it can’t be done. I just want to see if anybody will answer the question, which is very disagreeable, although much more painful for fedfans and nolefans.

But, also, now we have an answer about the hypo/hyperbarric chambers, the “egg”, etc.: we see that nothing has changed much.

When we watch a Novak-Andy match, we know, from other sports, that the heavier guy will be faster (Murray), but that the thinner will eventually outlast him (Novak). And this didn’t change in the last twelve months.

Now we know that Fed longevity is the fruit of his work and the improvements of his game. We know that Novak is declining very slowly because he is painfully improving his serve, his FH in open stance (DTL especially).

There is no magical potion here, but a careful planing of the schedule, and although mainly healthy, they both skip tournaments when they are injured or have pain, and, overall, play much less tournaments than other top 10 players.

Finally, if everything was so clean in tennis, why would the ATP introduce blood passeports for the top 50?


sienna Says:

mat4 is raising valid questions about Nadal and his decline that seems to have started with the bloodpassport.

I agree questions need to be asked and if that doesnt get noticed inquiries need to be made.


Annie Nadal Says:

I totally disagree w/comment “bet he would prefer to not be in any finals other than RG”. Rafael lives to compete…he thrives on competition.
Just because other sportsman in different sports have taken drugs to win doesn’t mean that Rafael does. He has clearly stated that he would choose to retire than rely on illegal drugs to enhance his performance. That just does not go w/his beliefs/his standards/morals. If any of you truly believe that…then you truly do not understand Rafael. Tennis players are tested after each match…at random without any notice etc. Have you ever heard of Rafael not passing a urine or blood test??? the answer is NO…just because jerks who don’t like him repeatedly write that he is not really injured as he says he is BUT that he is trying to get the “roids out of his system


Annie Nadal Says:

are jealous of his record compared to whoever they say they are a big fan of. They are “pond scum” who are looking for their 15 minutes of fame…always stirring the pot for any reactions from “real tennis fans” that’s what they live for. Their behavior is totally disrespectful of any tennis player they are constantly bashing/trash talking about especially Rafael.


Annie Nadal Says:

Don’t lump him in w/other athletes who cheat just because some Dr. has given drugs etc to other players from his country. Truly obsurd! Guilt by association…just because they come from the same country??? Seriously??? “we have to ask the question re blood work etc. Really??? When it’s revealed & proven he has been doping…then have your opinion BUT that is never going to happen because he does not do illegal drugs…period! end of that thought process unless you are in junior high and have to always have the last word & think your opinion is the only correct one. Those people are bullies who need to have their cages rattled once and for all! If you are truly a Rafael fan you do not go around making statements that are derogatory…you take him at his word/believe him because he is an honest human being and stand behind him regardless of the outcome of his matches. 7 million Twitter followers cannot be wrong & approx. 15 million FB friends can’t be wrong either. Vamos RAFA!!!


Wog Boy Says:

“New” poster?


skeezer Says:

@mat4,
What’d I tell ya? ;)

Top story: Sinner Settles With WADA, Accepts 3-Month Ban, Won't Miss Rome, Won't Miss French Open
Most Recent story: Frustrated Nick Kyrgios Calls Sinner Ban A "Sad Day For Tennis"