Clijsters Wins US Open: What Does It Mean?
by Jeremy Davis | September 12th, 2010, 4:18 pm

What have we learned from laid-back mom Kim Clijsters’ second consecutive title (third if you count her retirement years out of tennis) at the US Open? That women’s tennis is an injury mess and Grand Slam titles are completely up for grabs.
There are plenty of pretenders out there — the meltdown master Vera Zvonareva, who threw another crying jag in the final before losing to Clijsters; Ana Ivanovic, who won the French before injuries and losses led to her belief going down the drain; and Ivanovic’s countrywoman Jelena Jankovic who also spent a brief period at No. 1 before it became apparent she didn’t have the championship merit.

It’s all about injuries now in the women’s game. If Serena Williams is in a final, she’s the favorite, but she’s sidelined more nowadays than playing. Her current cut foot is was a freak injury, but aside from that, she has had chronic knee and ankle problems due to carrying all that extra weight around. Clijsters was knocked out of the game and into early retirement due to injuries, and she had enough, ready to start a family. But when she saw the Ivanovics winning Slams and the Jankovics reaching No. 1, she thought, ‘Hey, my body feels a whole lot better after all this rest, and these players winning the big titles are a joke. Serena and Venus are always injured, Justine [Henin] is retired — if I made a comeback it would all be cake! Cake baby!”

So Clijsters came out of retirement (her success making Henin come back too), and since then it’s been easy. Serena missed another Slam this part fortnight, Venus is over the hill, and the best of the challengers is the sobbing, racquet-breaking Zvonareva.

It’s good from the WTA point of view because Clijsters as they would say is a ‘class act’ — talking-up opponents and providing great photo opportunities with her curly-blonde kid and generally being a great spokesman for the game rather than threatening to kill lineswomen on live television.

Clijsters even dominates U.S. tennis — she finished No. 2 in the US Open Series standings (behind another European, Caroline Wozniacki), and due to her success at the U.S. events she took home an extra $500,000 in addition to her $1.7 million for winning the US Open. Thanks USTA, here’s my checking account routing number in Belgium, just put that $2.2 million right in there.

As Serena and Clijsters have shown, champions are a breed above. Zvonareva had beaten Clijsters in their two previous meetings in 2010 but that didn’t matter in a pressure-packed Grand Slam final. Venus and Sharapova were once there, but they won’t win another Slam.

“Vera, just keep it going, it’ll happen,” Clijsters tried to assure Zvonareva, who won only three games, after the final.

Could happen, you never know. Clijsters lost her share of Slam titles before finally winning one. But on the not-likely side. Wozniacki never seems to beat big players on big occasions (Sharapova, who hasn’t won anything big since shoulder surgery? — doesn’t count).

Clijsters, if you remember, tore a muscle in her foot earlier this year and was out for a while. Henin is out for the year with an elbow injury. Serena hopes to soon return from a foot injury. Venus was out for a time this year, as was Sharapova. Ivanovic was out. I’m sure I’m leaving a lot of players out. In today’s modern game of super-racquets and strings that put a lot of stress on shoulders and elbows, and overtraining for some players, it is about avoiding injury. It is tougher than ever.

The rankings don’t show it, but like everyone hoped for at this year’s US Open with a Fed vs. Rafa final, in Australia women’s tennis fans will be hoping for a Serena vs. Kim final if the WTA’s two heavyweights can stay uninjured long enough to meet. In the meantime, with a handful to the top players/names injured at any time, anything goes.

You Might Like:
Clijsters Beats Schnyder; How Weak is WTA Tour?
3rd Tourney Into Comeback, Clijsters Wins US Open
Kim Clijsters Beats Caroline Wozniacki In Come-Back Exo
No Li Way as Clijsters Wins First Australian Open Title
Clijsters Fights Off 3 Match Points, Beats Sharapova for WTA Cincinnati Crown

Don't miss any tennis action, stay connected with Tennis-X

Get the FREE TX daily newsletter

13 Comments for Clijsters Wins US Open: What Does It Mean?

Dan Martin Says:

Great analysis. I think the best thing the WTA could have hoped for was Caroline W. winning and becoming the face of the weekly tour as she plays more than Serena. Clijsters winning was probably somewhere between 2-4 on their wish list after hearing Serena was hurt. Career wise 3 slams is pretty solid for Kim.

paula Says:

Venus could win Wimby again, I think.

Injuries on the men’s and women’s tour are problematic. I think, yes, the sport is harder on the body than it was, but also, the schedule is out of control. I love having tennis to watch all year long, but sheesh, it’s too much for them.

guy Says:

i think it’s premature to say sharapova is nolonger a contender. as annoying as she is, she has the mental. and her serve seems to be returning.

i think mauresmo and davenport should make comebacks also. i miss those two

paula Says:

I miss the Dav and Mo, too…both great players and greats sportswomen- class acts.

serenafan4evr Says:

you really cant say sharapova aint a contender. shes an elite player. Sharapova’s on the same level as venus/clijsters/henin. serena’s on top.

Kimo Says:

“Sharapova’s on the same level as venus/clijsters/henin.”

I’m a Sharapova fan, but I can’t agree with this statement. Sharapova plays with a lot more risk than those three and her movement is not as good. To me, Sharapova is sort of like Soderling without the great serve: hits very flat, plays low percentage tennis, is very tenatious, doesn’t move so well. When her game is clicking, she can still make some big wins, but it doesn’t click often, hence the term “low percentage”.

Dan Martin Says:

I think if Sharapova’s shoulder holds up she can contend again, but that is a big if.

BT Says:

I think Stosur is close to being a genuine contender but not quite consistent enough yet. She has the game. She seems better at handling pressure than she used to be.

DMB Says:

It’s rather a grimm outlook on things i would say. I have been a clijsters fan since she came on the tour so i am not complaining that she is winning again and indeed i can imagine that her comeback had to do with the competion out there not being very strong. So what does that say? In my mind (not burdened with any inside knowledge or stats) it says that there are new players waiting. When Clijsters came back she came back a different player. The first matches she played she really reminded me of Federer. As if she had been studying. She plays much more versatile these days and that might be just the boost the upcoming players need. Don’t tell me that mental toughness is a dying trait. It sounds like a writer suffering from old age. So what do i think Clijsters winnning US open again says? she’s frontrunning a whole new breed of female players that will change woman’s tennis. And i for one, can’t wait.

RZ Says:

I don’t think you give Clijsters enough credit here. She is a 3-time grand slam champion, a multi-finalist, and a threat on every surface. Sure, Serena is currently the favorite in every grand slam she plays, but Clijsters is probably the second favorite.

Thangs Says:

Juju, everyone is cherry picking..Please do well in 2011! Allez!

vrael Says:

for all the fed fans here…lucky federer wasnt playing this…he would have been destroyed


oromis Says:

too bad federer wasnt there in the finals.


i would have loved a rg 08 style beating for federer
here at uso 2010

Top story: Novak Djokovic Sets Record For Most Weeks At No. 1